Elon Musk, Taylor Swift, Tom Friedman offers America's Industrial Strategy

12/21/2024

Yesterday, I highlighted the U.S. struggle with strategies like de-coupling and de-risking, using onshoring, nearshoring, and friendshoring.

Two days ago I came across Thomas Friedman’s article, "How Elon Musk and Taylor Swift Can Resolve U.S.-China Relations?" It reveals a profound sense of anxiety.

Friedman begins bluntly: "I just spent a week in Beijing and Shanghai… and let me get right to the point: While we were sleeping, China took a great leap forward in high-tech manufacturing of everything."

He sounds alarmed, noting, "You have to go to China to see it… a lot of people in Washington have missed the country’s staggering manufacturing growth."

This is something new when he mentioned "dark factories." These are factories so highly automated and fully roboticized that they operate day and night without lights, as there’s no need for human presence—aside from engineers occasionally adjusting the machines. As China Daily explains, “Dark factories, also called smart factories, are entirely run by programmed robots.”

China’s independent manufacturing ecosystem is unparalleled, capable of producing and sourcing virtually any component or material domestically. Friedman acknowledges this, stating, "No other country in the world has such a complete homegrown ecosystem."

A Chinese saying captures the rapid development of China, “日新月异” (rì xīn yuè yì), means "transformative changes with each passing day," symbolizing rapid progress and continuous innovation. It reflects China's transformative growth in high-tech manufacturing and infrastructure.

Toward the end, Friedman credits China’s achievements, saying, "We fool ourselves if we believe China’s growing strength in advanced manufacturing is only from unfair trade practices. It’s also because it has people driven to work ‘9-9-6’—9 a.m. to 9 p.m., six days a week—and because Beijing has invested in world-class infrastructure and education, producing countless engineering graduates."

Make no mistake, Friedman’s intent isn’t to praise China but to urge the U.S. to respond urgently to China's technological and manufacturing rise. He proposes an “Elon Musk-Taylor Swift paradigm”—suggesting that the U.S. should focus on Elon Musk-type innovation and domestic manufacturing ability, while China should open its door to Taylor Swift-type American culture, products, food and drink. In other word, Americans should produce and export more while China should import and consume more American goods.

Finally, Friedman warns, without strong industrial efforts, the U.S. risks losing its competitive edge to China’s technological and manufacturing dominance.

views
15 responses
Yanwen Xia upvoted this post.
“ Americans should produce and export more while China should import and consume more American goods.” Easier to consume than to produce, just as easier said than done
Friedman, at least, credited China with its 9-9-6, inferstructure, etc, not unfair trade like many people whining about
“ Elon Musk-Taylor Swift paradigm” Asking Americans to work as hard and smart as Musk and 9-9-6? It’s like switching places, Americans becoming Chinese, Chinese becoming American.
I think of JD Vance elegy.
From a friend, “Friedman made a good point on China and a warning for the US. Your interpretation of his article is clear. Americans can never work as hard as the Chinese. But, a big BUT, China’s 内卷 is so severe. Young people, in particular, are working too hard. My niece and her husband both work for 国企。 They work 9-9-6. Recently her husband is diagnosed with late stage stomach cancer due to overwork. He is only 40 years old. [Frown]”
9 visitors upvoted this post.