10/7/2026
Last Sunday, I came across an article that immediately provoked a strong reaction in me. Its title was “Why Do Chinese Audiences Love Watching Women Catch the Other Woman?” (中国人为什么这么爱看“抓小三”, Zhōngguó rén wèishénme zhème ài kàn “zhuā xiǎosān”).
The article explores the enduring popularity of Chinese television dramas featuring wives confronting their husbands' mistresses. It begins with a scene from The First Half of My Life (《我的前半生》) that went viral nine years ago and traces how the “other woman,” or 小三 (xiǎosān), has been portrayed in Chinese television dramas over the decades.
The author also explores why stories about infidelity attract audiences. This fascination is not unique to China. From an evolutionary perspective, jealousy may be a natural response to perceived threats to a relationship. Watching a confrontation between a wife and her husband's mistress may allow viewers to experience these threats vicariously.
There is also the satisfaction of seeing someone who has violated a social norm punished. Negative gossip and conflict can capture our attention, making these characters compelling to both viewers and writers.
The article cites survey data suggesting that self-reported rates of extramarital sex increased between 2000 and 2020, with men consistently reporting higher rates than women.
To its credit, the author also points out that blaming all marital problems on a third party oversimplifies the reality of relationships. It gives people an easy target for their anger while allowing deeper problems within a marriage to go unexamined.
But one assumption in these stories particularly bothers me: the idea that the husband is essentially a decent family man who is tempted and seduced by another woman.
The mistress is often portrayed as the villain who started pursuing a married man and destroys his family. The man, meanwhile, appears almost passive, as though he has been led astray against his better judgment. Public anger is directed overwhelmingly at the woman, while the married man receives far less condemnation.
This issue is not merely an observation about television dramas for me. It touches something I have seen in my own family. One of my relatives was involved with another woman for two years while he was already in a relationship with someone else. What troubles me is that people tend to focus on the “third person” and blame her, while paying much less attention to the man’s own choices.
I find this deeply unfair.
A married man is not a victim of temptation. He is a person who made a commitment and has the responsibility to honor it. Whatever role another woman may have played, he remains responsible for his own choices. To portray him as someone who was merely seduced shifts the blame away from the person who broke his marital commitment.
This reflects a broader double standard in attitudes toward extramarital affairs. Women are often judged more harshly than men, while men's infidelity may be excused as a natural weakness or the result of irresistible temptation. "All men are like this," as my sister explained. The underlying message is that men cannot always be expected to remain faithful, but women should be held responsible for tempting them. Why double standard?
If a marriage involves two people, responsibility for protecting it cannot rest on one person alone. Should we hold both accountable without treating one as the sole villain and the other as a helpless victim?
Thinking about this double standard and Women's Lib movement reminds me of an old cigarette commercial with the slogan, “You've come a long way, baby.”
Women have indeed come a long way in their struggle for equality. Yet some old assumptions remain stubbornly alive.
Perhaps we have come a long way—but we still have a long way to go before men and women are judged by the same standards.