We grew up watching movies like Walter Defends Sarajevo (瓦尔特保卫萨拉热窝), which depicts the brave Yugoslav fighters defending their homeland toward the end of World War II.
My heart is overwhelmed with profound nostalgia when I think of that movie and Yugoslavia at that time. China was relatively isolated then, with few friends in the world. What happened to the federal republic of Yugoslavia led by its strong leader Josip Tito?
In Chinese, there is a famous saying: 分久必合,合久必分 (fēn jiǔ bì hé, hé jiǔ bì fēn) — Unity will inevitably prevail after a prolonged separation, and a long period of unity will inevitably lead to separation. This describes the cyclical nature of Chinese history.
Are we seeing the same cycle in Southeast Europe? Perhaps. The former Yugoslavia went through significant social, ethnic, and political turmoil after the death of its great leader Tito, influenced by both internal conflicts and outside forces.
First, in every society, there are two forces at work: one for unity and another for separation. When the force for unity prevails, you have a united nation. Otherwise, you see a fragmented one like the former Yugoslavia.
Second, most of these shifts have historically been accomplished through war, with a few modern-day exceptions like the peaceful dissolution of the Soviet Union.
Third, internal factors are often the determining forces. As the saying goes, the easiest way to capture a castle is from within. The enemy within is the most dangerous.
President Lincoln echoed this sentiment when he said, "A house divided against itself cannot stand." Reflecting on the past, it becomes clear that the surest way to secure national unity is through internal cohesion and cooperation.
Ultimately, the cycles of unity and separation teach us that the internal strength of any entity, whether a nation or an organization or even a family, lies in its ability to foster internal solidarity while withstanding external pressures.